Legal Opinion

Tapp v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 31, 1960No. 38682PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

Elijah Delos Tapp, appellant, complains of error below in determining, on appeal from the county court, the manner of resort to property for payment of debts, taxes and expenses of the estate of James Leonard Tapp, deceased. The testamentary instrument makes, so far as pertinent, the following dispositions:

Clause I consists of a general provision for payment of debts, expenses of last illness and funeral.

Clause II provides a specific devise to Virginia Sue Entriken, decedent’s niece, of property known as the Strode Farm.

■ Clause III contains a devise to Albert Bryan Tapp,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seattle-First National Bank v. MacOmberWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Roy B. Thompson, Jr., of the Will of Roy B. Thompson, Deceased v. Earl R. Wiseman, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
  3. Central Trust Co. v. BurrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. In Re the Estate of RettenmeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Grise, Admr. v. Weiss, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MacFarlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. Matter of Estate of BovairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. National Newark & Essex Bank v. HartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. Matter of Estate of HixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. In Re DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API