Legal Opinion

Stone v. Board of Governance of Pennsylvania Bar

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1933No. Appeal, 279,PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

September 25, 1933:

The respondent appeals from the recommendation of the Board of Governance approving that of the hearing masters that an order of disbarment be entered against him. The proceeding was initiated by Jacob Klensin against whom we have entered an order of disbarment simnltaneons herewith [the preceding case].

We think no good purpose would be served by elaborately setting forth details of respondent’s misconduct upon which the recommendations rest. There was evidence before the hearing masters which warranted the conclusions to which they came. These conclusions are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Snyder's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Ex parte Steinman & HenselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  4. Barach's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. In re ShoemakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Office of the Disciplinary Counsel v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Schofield Discipline CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Williford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Lemisch's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. In Re BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API