Legal Opinion

Ex parte Steinman & Hensel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1880PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Writs of error to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Lancaster county: Of May Term 1880, Nos. 173 and 174. The court below entered rules on A. J. Steinman and W. U. Hensel, to show cause why they should not appear and answer for contempt of court, and also why they should not be disbarred for misbehavior in their offices as attorneys of said court.

Read the full summary

Writs of error to the Court of Quarter Sessions of Lancaster county: Of May Term 1880, Nos. 173 and 174. The court below entered rules on A. J. Steinman and W. U. Hensel, to show cause why they should not appear and answer for contempt of court, and also why they should not be disbarred for misbehavior in their offices as attorneys of said court. The facts are fully stated in the following opinion of the court below, Patterson, A. L. J. “ Whereas, on January 20th 1880, in the presence of said court being then in open session, the judge then presiding sent a messenger of the court to inform…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sharswood

The record before us has been brought up by a writ of error under the Act of Assembly approved May 19th 1879, Pamph. L. 66, entitled “An act regulating-proceedings against attorneys-at-*236law in this Commonwealth.” It provides “that in all cases of any proceedings in any court of this Commonwealth against any attorney of said court for unprofessional conduct as an officer of such court, said attorney shall be entitled to a writ of error from the Supreme Court of this Commonwealth, as in civil cases to said court, from any judgment, order or decree of. said court against him as such officer,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Case of AustinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Snyder's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Montgomery County Bar Ass'n v. RinalducciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. In the Matter of ShigonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Schofield Discipline CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API