Legal Opinion
Gentile v. Ives
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1970PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment, rendered by a referee exercising the powers of the Superior Court, reassessing the damages sustained by the plaintiffs in the taking by the defendant of a portion of their property for highway purposes.
The plaintiffs assign error in the failure of the referee to find certain facts and in the finding of other facts without evidence. “These assignments of error have not been pursued in their brief and are, therefore, treated as abandoned.” Martin v. Kavanewsky, 157 Conn. 514, 516, 255 A.2d 619.
The following facts were found by the referee: On June…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Martin v. KavanewskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Town of Winchester v. CoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Morgan v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Stanley Works v. New Britain Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Moss v. New Haven Redevelopment AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Birnbaum v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Kelly v. IvlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Slavitt v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Toffolon v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.