Brauer v. Freccia
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
The plaintiffs sought to have conveyed to them certain realty in Greenwich pursuant to an option contained in a lease between them and the defendant Frank J. Freccia. The plaintiffs attempted to exercise this option, but the owners refused to convey. The plaintiffs then instituted suit in the Superior Court seeking an order directing the defendants to convey the property. The trial court concluded that they were not entitled to the relief sought and rendered judgment for the defendants. The plaintiffs have appealed to this court.
The plaintiffs claim that certain admitted or undisputed facts…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- F. B. Fountain Co. v. SteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Johnston Jewels, Ltd. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.