Masonick v. J.P. Homes, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM J. FLEMING, Judge.*
Louis and Rosemary Masonick sued appellant City of Lino Lakes, respondent J.P. Homes, Inc., and respondent Fireside Corner, Inc. seeking recovery for fire damage to their newly-constructed home. The City of Lino Lakes moved for summary judgment on two theories: (1) discretionary act immunity pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 466.03, subd. 6; and (2) no private duty. The trial court denied the City’s motion, and it appealed. We reverse on the issue of discretionary immunity.
FACTS
In July 1989, respondents Louis and Rosemary Masonick hired J.P. Homes, Inc. to build a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Holmquist v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Jadwin v. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Snyder v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDonough v. City of RosemountCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- BD. OF REGENTS OF U OF M v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Vrieze v. New Century Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Rasivong v. Lakewood Community CollegeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- McNamara v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.