Legal Opinion
McDonough v. City of Rosemount
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 1993No. CX-92-2442, CO-92-2448PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Respondent Michael McDonough brought a lawsuit which arose out of his unsuccessful attempt to sell land to the City of Rosemount. The defendants are the City of Rosemount, E.B. McMenomy, individually, and Stephan Jilk, individually. The city, McMenomy and Jilk moved for summary judgment. The court limited recovery in the breach of contract claim to specific performance, granted summary judgment for the city on an issue not appealed, and denied summary judgment on the remaining counts. The city, Jilk, and McMenomy appeal, claiming they are entitled to summary judgment…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Pletan v. GainesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gleason v. Metropolitan Council Transit OperationsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Janklow v. Minnesota Board of Examiners for Nursing Home AdministratorsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- City of Minneapolis v. Ames & Fischer Co. II, LLPCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Pigs R US, LLC v. Compton TownshipCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Lishinski v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.