Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Florio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*777Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 5, 2003, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The record establishes that claimant was employed as a substitute teacher on a long-term assignment. He indicated a preference for teaching certain subjects, but was employed as a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FradysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of ZalinkaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. In re the Claim of RindAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of PainoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of SangiorgioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of LeonettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API