Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

A-Mark Coin Co. v. General Mills, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1983No. Civ. 67252PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINERMAN, P. J.

A-Mark Coin Company (A-Mark) appeals from a judgment after a court trial denying it any relief in its suit against respondents General Mills, Inc. (General Mills), Bowers & Ruddy Galleries, Inc. (Bowers & Ruddy), Rare Coin Galleries (Rare Coin), James F. Ruddy (Ruddy), Q. David Bowers (Bowers) and Joel Rettew (Rettew). A-Mark’s suit against respondents was based on allegations of intentional interference with a contractual relationship and with an advantageous business relationship.

There is no dispute as to the essential facts giving rise to the lawsuit, and,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Herron v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Saunders v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. PMC, Inc. v. Saban Entertainment, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Global Eagle Entertainment, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  4. Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Los Angeles Land Co. Sierra Palm Partners West Lanes Inc. v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API