Legal Opinion
Cameron v. Cozens
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1973No. Civ. 39789PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
The question is whether a petition for a writ of “administrative” mandate (Code Civ. Proc,, § 1094.5), filed 71 days after a decision of the Director of the Department of Motor Vehicles (“director”—“department”) suspending an operator’s license, is untimely under applicable statutory provisions. We hold that it is not and reverse the superior court’s dismissal of the petition.
The superior court petition, which was filed on August 31, 1971, alleged that the director’s decision suspending petitioner’s operator’s license under the provisions of section 13353, subdivision (b) of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. PenningtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Olivas v. WeinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Serenko v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Yanke v. State Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. CozensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Koons v. Placer Hills Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Aroney v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Marquez v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Negaard v. Department of AeronauticsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.