Legal Opinion

Aroney v. California Horse Racing Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1983No. Civ. 66712PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COMPTON, Acting P. J.

Appeal from the denial of a petition for administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5), which petition sought to compel the California Horse Racing Board (Board) to vacate its order barring petitioner, Theodore Aroney, from entering or wagering at the Hollywood Park Race Track (Hollywood).

Petitioner, after being excluded by Hollywood, sought and obtained a hearing before the board pursuant to Business and Professions Code section 19573, which provides in part as follows:. “Any person who, pursuant to a rule of the board, is excluded or ejected from any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Epstein v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Compton v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Cameron v. CozensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. California Standardbred Sires Stakes Committee, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Morrison v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Capitol Racing, LLC v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Cockshott v. Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Ragan v. City of HawthorneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API