Legal Opinion

Recording Devices Co. v. Porterfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1972No. 71-666PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals which affirmed an assessment of sales taxes by the Tax Commissioner against appellant.

Appellant is engaged in a business, whereby under contracts with its customers, appellant furnishes and in*209stalls time lock and recording devices on the doors of customer’s premises. Each lock furnished and installed by appellant has several keys of variable lengths. The customer then furnishes to certain of its personnel individual keys, each of which, when used to lock or unlock the customer’s door, causes a record of the time and identity of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Machinery Moving, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. American District Telegraph Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Bunker-Ramo Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Accountant's Computer Services, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Emery Industries, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Koch v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API