Legal Opinion

American District Telegraph Co. v. Porterfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1968No. Nos. 41402 and 41403PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The pertinent part of Section 5739.01(B), Revised Code, provides:

“ ‘Sale’ and ‘selling’ include all transactions by which * * * possession * * * of tangible personal property, is or is to be transferred * * * ‘sale’ and ‘selling’ do not include * * * personal service transactions which involve the transfer of tangible personal property as an inconsequential element, for which no separate charges are made.”

The Tax Commissioner contends that the central station contracts of the taxpayers do not fall within the personal service exception to “sales” because they are not personal service…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pla Mor, Inc. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Emery Industries, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Koch v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Columbus Coated Fabrics Division v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Machinery Moving, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Recording Devices Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API