Legal Opinion
Machinery Moving, Inc. v. Porterfield
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 28, 1971No. 70-151PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtManos, J.
The question is whether the transfers of containers and bins by Trashtainer to its customers constitute sales of tangible personal property, taxable under R. C. 5739.02, or whether the transfers are personal service transactions which constitute an inconsequential element for which no separate charges are made, and exempt from taxation.
R. C. 5739.01(B) provides:
“ ‘Sale’ and ‘selling’ include all transactions by which title or possession, or both, of tangible personal property, is or is to be transferred. * * * Other than as provided in this section, ‘sale3 and ‘selling’ do not include * * *…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American District Telegraph Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- Bunker-Ramo Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
- Pla Mor, Inc. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by10 opinions
- Emery Industries, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. v. City of Commerce CityColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Koch v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Columbus Coated Fabrics Division v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- Quotron Systems Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.