Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Kosydar
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.
At issue in this case are two categories of tangible personal property claimed by appellant to be excepted from Ohio sales and use taxes, pursuant to R. C. 5739.01(B) and (E)(2). For purposes of this discussion, the tax in issue will be treated as sales tax, pursuant to R. C. 5741.02(C)(2).
I
The first category of goods assessed by the Tax Commissioner, and at issue herein, consists of advertising materials. These materials consist, in general, of radio and T. V. commercials, and free-lance artists’ sketches used in newspaper and magazine compositions. The assessment *4relating to. radio and T.Y.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ace Steel Baling, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Accountant's Computer Services, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Jewel Companies v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Nucor Steel v. LeuenbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- White Motor Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Houghton Mifflin Co. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- WTAR Radio-TV Corp. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.