Legal Opinion

Shanks v. Pearson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1903No. 12,886PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error, from Mitchell district court; E. M. Picklbr, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J. :

This case involves the power and duty of a road overseer in repairing, draining and improving highways. The plaintiffs, who owned a farm in Mitchell county, sought to enjoin the road overseer, who was proceeding to' dig a deep ditch in front of their residence and farm. The township trustee was named as a defendant, but,- as he disclaimed any connection with the making of the ditch, the plaintiffs consented that judgment be rendered *169against them for costs, so far as the trustee was concerned, and he went out of the case. The real…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hari v. Ohio TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. City of Emporia v. GilchristSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fisher v. Delaware TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Engler v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Marts v. FreemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Breedlove v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. State ex rel. Conly v. Riverside Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API