Legal Opinion

Hari v. Ohio Township

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 1900No. 11,727PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Saline district court; R. F, Thompson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*316The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster,, C. J.:

This was an action brought by Anna Hari against Ohio township, Saline county, to recover damages for injuries sustained on account of a defective highway. The action was brought under section 579 of the General Statutes of 1899 (Gen. Stat. 1897, ch. 42, § 48), which allows a recovery against a township on account of defective highways, when the' trustee of such township shall have had at least five days’ notice of the existence of the defects prior to the time when the injury occurred. A demurrer to the petition was sustained, and from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Board of Chosen Freeholders v. HoughSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Fisher v. Delaware TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  3. Cunningham v. Township of ClaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  4. Watkins v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Erie Township v. BeamerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API