Coburn v. Brooks
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. • The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This action was commenced August 22, 1876, trial had January 6, 1886, and judgment of non-suit thereafter entered, from which plaintiff has appealed. The action is against the defendants as sureties, in an undertaking given under section 1254 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The defendants herein became sureties for the plaintiffs in the case of Templeton v. Coburn, a proceeding in eminent domain then pending in the twelfth district court. The condition of the undertaking is, that said sureties “do hereby undertake, promise, and agree that the plaintiffs in this case shall and will pay all…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murdock v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Pierce v. WhitingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Morgan v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Parnell v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Morgan v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Treweek v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Pierce v. MerrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Carpenter v. FurreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Kelley v. LeachmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.