Tinker v. . Rice Motors, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdaMs, J.
This is a motion to set aside tbe purported service of process and to dismiss tbe action. Tbe motion was allowed upon tbe following facts, wbicb were found by tbe trial j’udge.
The plaintiff was indebted to tbe defendant on certain notes; also on agreements for tbe conditional sale of personal property. In January, 1929, J. E. Pierce, upon whom process in tbe present action was served, came to Buncombe County and made an effort to collect tbe amount due by tbe plaintiff to tbe defendant. Failing to mate tbe collection be caused warrants to be issued charging the plaintiff with tbe felonious…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Whitehurst v. . KerrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Cape Fear Railways, Inc. v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Cunningham Ex Rel. Alexander v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- Moore Falk v. . the Freeman's National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Higgs v. Sperry.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Radio Station WMFR, Inc. v. Eitel-McCullough, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Ryan v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- J. B. Blades Lumber Co. v. Finance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Tar River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- McDonald Service Co. v. People's National Bank of Rock HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.