Moore Falk v. . the Freeman's National Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil ACTioif, heard before Shipp, Judge, at Fall Term, 1884, of Buncombe Superior Courft The facts fully appear in the opinion; The defendant Bank appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtAshe, J.
This was a civil action brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant, a foreign corporation. The summons was returnable to the February Term, 1884, of Buncombe Superior Court, before Shipp, Judge. The defendant Nesbitt answered the complaint, and the counsel of the defendant corporation entered a special appearance to deny that the summons had been legally served upon it. The court after hearing the affidavits hereafter set forth, adjudged that Frank E. Nesbitt, upon whom the process had been served, was such an agent as a service may be made upon, and that the defendant bank might have…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cunningham Ex Rel. Alexander v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jenkins v. Penn Bridge Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
- J. B. Blades Lumber Co. v. Finance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Dyar v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- McDonald Service Co. v. People's National Bank of Rock HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Tinker v. . Rice Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.