Legal Opinion
City of Tucson v. Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 28, 1997No. 2 CA-CV 97-0135PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
Pima County appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of the City of Tucson, which declared that A.R.S. § 11-371 authorizes the County to issue Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) revenue bonds for projects within incorporated areas of the County without restriction. We vacate the court’s judgment.
The state collects fuel and vehicle taxes, vehicle registration and license fees, and other transportation-related revenues and places them in the HURF. A.R.S. § 28-6533 (formerly § 28-1598(A)). 1 Pursuant to a comprehensive distribution scheme, the legislature divides HURF…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Lake Havasu City v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Sandblom v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- City of Casa Grande v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Andrews v. Samaritan Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Mason v. CansinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Tanque Verde Unified School District No. 13 v. BerniniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Cuvelier v. SchmitzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.