Legal Opinion

Lake Havasu City v. Mohave County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 20, 1983No. 1 CA-CIV 6497PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREER, Judge.

In this appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Mohave County (the County), we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred by holding that the County is not obligated to provide certain health services 1 to residents of Lake Havasu City, Arizona (the City). The determinative issues are:

1) Whether A.R.S. § 36-190 obligates the County to provide health services to residents of the City at no charge; and,

2) Whether it is a violation of the equal protection laws to allow the County to require a cost contribution from the City where identical services are provided…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Rocky Mountain Oil & Gas Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization, Department of Revenue & TaxationWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rio Rico Properties v. Santa Cruz CountyArizona Tax Court · 1992
  3. American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. HullDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
  4. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API