Legal Opinion

Deicher v. Corkery

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1962No. Civ. 25839PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

Defendants Corkery and Pond appeal from plaintiff’s judgment of $5,700 rendered after a nonjury trial in an action brought to recover a commission allegedly due to respondent from appellants as a result of a real estate transaction.

Respondent is a licensed real estate broker. In the latter part of May 1959, he entered into negotiations with appellant Pond relating to the sale of a subdivision in Riverside County, the title to which stood in the name of appellant Corkery, who, as the evidence hereinafter recited will show, was engaged in a joint venture with Pond in the ownership and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gantner v. GantnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Grant v. WeatherholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Kraner v. HalseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Smalley v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Stickel v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  3. Clifton Cattle Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Steele v. Litton Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. In Re JonesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API