Legal Opinion

Aura v. Brandt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1941No. Nos. 32,929, 33,091PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1 Reported in 1 N.W.2d 381. On December 3, 1940, an election was held in the village of Hibbing to fill the offices of recorder and one trustee. Contestant Aura and contestee, Brandt, were candidates for recorder. Contestant Arthur Reese is a voter. For convenience, we shall refer only to the candidates as contestant and contestee, respectively. In an election contest the court below found that contestant received 3,521 votes and contestee 3,512 votes; that contestant was elected by nine votes, but that he was not entitled to possession of the office for failure on his part to file a verified…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rexroth v. ScheinIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Elwell v. ComstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Winn v. BlackmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. SederstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  5. Sego v. StoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Maffett v. TurnbullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Murray v. FloydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Fitzgerald v. MorlockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Marshall v. StepkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Sperl v. WegwerthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API