State v. Sederstrom
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Chippewa county, Qvale, J., denying a motion to set aside the verdict of guilty, and for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellants were charged with selling intoxicating liquor without having first obtained a license as required by the laws of the state. The' defendants admitted the sale of a certain beverage, but denied that it was intoxicating. This presented the only issue for the jury.
The appellants assign numerous errors; but, in view of the fact that the law upon all the questions raised has been frequently declared by this court, it is unnecessary to consider them in detail. The trial court refused the requests of the defendants for separate trials. As they were charged with a misdemeanor, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Lindquist v. DicksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- People v. ElcoMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Schulte v. FitchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- State ex rel. Fenner v. KeatingMontana Supreme Court · 1917
- State ex rel. Kelly v. WolferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.