State v. Calegar
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.
— Michael Calegar argues that a prior conviction for possession of a controlled substance was inadmissible to impeach his testimony in his trial for obtaining a controlled substance by means of a forged prescription.
On October 22, 1993, Calegar went to the emergency room at Valley Medical Center for an eye injury sustained in his job as a welder. The examining physician, Dr. Larry Kedig, wrote Calegar three prescriptions in black ink, including one prescription for eight tablets of Vicodin, a narcotic pain-killer. Dr. Kedig placed the prescriptions on a clipboard hung outside Calegar’s…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. RayWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. AlexisWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- United States v. Jesus OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. OsterWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. OsterWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. CalegarWashington Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.