Legal Opinion

State v. Calegar

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1997No. 64948-1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, J.

— Michael Calegar argues that a prior conviction for possession of a controlled substance was inadmissible to impeach his testimony in his trial for obtaining a controlled substance by means of a forged prescription.

On October 22, 1993, Calegar went to the emergency room at Valley Medical Center for an eye injury sustained in his job as a welder. The examining physician, Dr. Larry Kedig, wrote Calegar three prescriptions in black ink, including one prescription for eight tablets of Vicodin, a narcotic pain-killer. Dr. Kedig placed the prescriptions on a clipboard hung outside Calegar’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. RayWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. AlexisWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. United States v. Jesus OrtizCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. State v. RiversWashington Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. OsterWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. OsterWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. State v. CalegarWashington Supreme Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API