Legal Opinion

State v. Rivers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1996No. 63412-2PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

— Defendant Paul Rivers challenges both his underlying conviction for second degree robbery and the constitutionality of the Persistent Offender Accountability Act, the statute under which he was sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of parole. We affirm the conviction and the sentence.

Facts

On December 20, 1993, less than three weeks after Washington’s Persistent Offender Accountability Act went into effect, Defendant Paul Rivers was arrested for the robbery of an espresso bar employee in the University District of Seattle.

The victim of the robbery, Josef Slobodzian, testified…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API