Legal Opinion

State v. Saunders

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 10, 1998No. 21177-7-IIPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

— Lee C. Saunders was convicted of possession of methamphetamine and possession of heroin. Saunders contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for eliciting on direct examination his prior conviction for possession of methamphetamine. We agree and, therefore, reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

Lee Saunders was stopped for speeding in Yelm, Washington. A driver’s check alerted the officer that there was an outstanding warrant for Saunders’ arrest. After arresting Saunders, the officer searched the vehicle, which was not owned by or registered to Saunders. During the search, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. HendricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. Fortun-CebadaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. State v. Fortun-CebadaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API