Legal Opinion

King v. Unger

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1939No. Civ. 12196; Civ. 12231PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, J. —

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him when he was struck by an automobile while walking across the intersection at Ninth Street and Broadway in the city of Los Angeles on February 27, 1937. At a trial with a jury he obtained judgments against appellant Unger as driver and against appellant Herbert E. Woodward, Inc., as owner of the automobile. Both defendants have appealed from the judgments and plain*194tiff has appealed from the judgment and from the order denying his motion to enter judgment against Unger in the sum of $6,677.16 and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. CIT CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Kerrison v. UngerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Bradford v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. King v. UngerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Collard v. LoveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. ParrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Maxwell v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Sparks v. BerntsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Larson v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. King v. UngerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API