Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Brock

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 20, 1934No. Civ. No. 8422PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs, heirs at law of Elizabeth Otley, deceased, brought this action to recover damages for her death. She was struck and killed by an automobile driven by defendant Brock, an employee of his co-defendant Stationery Company. The automobile was owned by the employer and the driver was in the course of his employment at the time of the accident. Deceased, in company with a young boy, was crossing Wilshire Boulevard at the intersection of Crescent Heights Boulevard in the city of Los Angeles at about 7:30 o’clock in the evening of January 29, 1930, when the accident…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marriott v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Simoneau v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Burk v. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Snodgrass v. HandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Brown v. ReganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Jacobson v. ParrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Harbor Insurance v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Phipps v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API