Legal Opinion

King v. Unger

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1939No. Civ. 12196; Civ. 12231Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 Cal.App.2d 192 (1939)

GEORGE R. KING, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

MILTON R. UNGER et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Civ. No. 12196.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.

October 18, 1939.

Paul Blackwood and Samuel P. Young for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Charles H. Goebel, Parker & Stanbury and Vernon W. Hunt for Defendants and Appellants.

Wood, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him when he was struck by an automobile while walking across the intersection at Ninth Street and Broadway in the city of Los Angeles on…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. ReganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Schmidt v. CIT CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Kerrison v. UngerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Bradford v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. King v. UngerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API