Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. CIT Corporation

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1936No. Civ. 9904PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Two actions, one by an injured minor and the other by the father of the injured minor, were brought to recover damages resulting from the injuries sustained by the minor in an automobile accident. Said actions were consolidated for the purpose of trial and for the purpose of this appeal. Judgments were rendered in said actions in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants Jay Seaman and C. I. T. Corporation. The appeals from said judgments have been taken solely by the defendant C. I. T. Corporation.

Appellant was held liable as owner under the provisions of section 1714¼ of the Civil…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bunch v. KinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ferroni v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Kompf v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Harbor Insurance v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Dean v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Leplat v. Raley Wiles Auto SalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API