Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Gray

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1926No. 20074. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The plaintiff is desirous of obtaining from the defendants $2,850 for services rendered under a contract which he claims existed between them, and $5,700 loss of profits, as damages for the breach of that contract by the defendants. The alleged contract was one relating to the construction óf a bridge over the Columbia river between the states of Washington and Oregon. The plaintiff, who is a consulting bridge engineer, claims that he made a contract whereby he assumed the responsibility of the Construction of the proposed bridge, and rests his claim of contract upon a correspondence between…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lloyd v. American Can Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Ham, Yearsley & Ryrie v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Locomotive Exchange, Inc. v. Rucker Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Chapin v. American Can Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hopkins v. UlvestadWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Lockard v. City of SalemWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Weaver v. General Metals MergerWashington Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API