Chapin v. American Can Co.

This and Lloyd v. American Can Co., ante p. 298, 222 Pac. 876, the decision in which has just *317been handed down, are companion cases. We refer to the Lloyd case for a statement of the facts. Most of the questions involved here have been determined in that case. There are, however, a few questions involved here that were not in that case.(1) Appellant contends that it was error for the trial court to permit the respondent to testify that the president of the appliance corporation had informed him at the time he was appointed agent that an arrangement had been made by the appliance corporation…