Legal Opinion
Kulinka v. Flockhart Foundry Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided September 12, 1950PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
9 N.J. Super. 495 (1950)
75 A.2d 557
ALEX KULINKA, BY HELEN BUJALSKI, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v.
FLOCKHART FOUNDRY COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County Court Law Division.
Decided September 12, 1950.
Sara M. Lewitt and Mr. Alexander Avidan for petitioner-appellant.
Messrs. James J. Carroll and Frank Fink for respondent-appellee.
FRANCIS, J.C.C.
The appeal here is from the dismissal of appellant's petition for workmen's compensation by the Workmen's Compensation Division of the Department of Labor.
The claim for compensation was presented by Helen…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gilbert v. Gilbert Machine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- Link v. Eastern Aircraft, Linden Division, General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Patton v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Patton v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Rhodehouse v. Director General of RailroadsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. State Roads Commission & State Accident FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Tlumac v. High Bridge StoneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- State v. ProvetNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Folsom v. Magna Manufacturing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Kelly v. Hackensack Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.