Legal Opinion
Donofrio v. Haag Brothers, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 27, 1950PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
10 N.J. Super. 258 (1950)
77 A.2d 42
ERIC DONOFRIO, PETITIONER-APPELLEE,
v.
HAAG BROTHERS, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 13, 1950.
Decided November 27, 1950.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.
Mr. Arthur F. Mead argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Cox & Walburg, attorneys).
Mr. Charles Wm. Kappes argued the cause for appellee (Mr. A. Michael Lepore, attorney).
The opinion of the court was delivered by WILLIAM J. BRENNAN, JR., J.A.D.
The employee in this workmen's compensation case is a butcher. He strained his back on…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hopler v. Hill City Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Streng's Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. GalassoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Zietko v. New Jersey Manufacturers Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
- McGimpsey v. SerrieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
3Cited by31 opinions
- D., L. & WR CO. v. City of HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Trusky v. Ford Motor Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- McGowan v. Peter Doelger Brewing Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Goldmann v. Johanna Farms, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Bialko v. H. Baker Milk Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.