Legal Opinion

State v. Muhammad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 2019No. 96090-9PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

F I L E\ IN CLERKS OFFICE X. This opinion was filed fof rocord date WOV 6 7 2811 i &-J— ~^^itUAhMA^ Susan L. Carlson GHIEFMSTKE / Supfeme Court Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 96090-9 Respondent, En Banc V. BISIR B. MUHAMMAD, Filed mjum Petitioner. WIGGINS, J.—Bisir Bilal Muhammad was convicted of first degree rape and felony murder. Principally at issue is whether the trial court erred in denying Muhammad's motion to suppress the physical evidence collected from his vehicle after police located it via a warrantless cell phone "ping."…

2Cases cited130 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Travis TuggleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  2. In re Pers. Restraint of KnightWashington Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. Chavis MurphySupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  4. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Dovontia ReedKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
  5. In re Pers. Restraint of KnightWashington Supreme Court · 2023

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API