Legal Opinion

State v. Hinton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2014No. 87663-1PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

González, J.

¶1 We consider whether a text message conversation was “a private affair [ ]” protected from a warrantless search by article I, section 7 of our state constitution. A police detective read text messages on a cell phone police seized from Daniel Lee, who had been arrested for possession of heroin. Among other things, the detective read an incoming text message from Shawn Hinton, responded to it posing as Lee, and arranged a drug deal. Hinton was consequently arrested and charged with attempted possession of heroin. Hinton contends that the detective’s conduct violated his rights…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Nissen v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. MuhammadWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. RodenWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. MartinesWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. Michael PatinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API