Legal Opinion

Mason v. Ault

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2001No. 36A01-0012-CV-406PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTINGLY-MAY, Judge.

Harold Mason d/b/a H & M Roofing and Construction (“Mason”) obtained a default judgment against Herb R. Ault (“Ault”) and Dianna L. Mikels (“Mikels”). 1 The trial court granted Ault and Mikels’ Motion for Relief from Judgment, and Mason appeals. He raises one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court erred in setting aside the default judgment.

We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Ault and Mason entered into a contract whereby Mason was to perform certain construction work on Ault’s residence. Disputes arose, and Mason filed a contractor’s lien…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Smith v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Green v. KarolIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Moe v. KoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rogers v. LockardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Goldsmith v. JonesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Walker v. KelleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Darling v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Manning-Dow v. FoxIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API