Legal Opinion

Walker v. Kelley

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 2004No. 72A04-0406-JV-335PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Darryl Eugene Walker ("Father") appeals the trial court's grant of Paula Ann Kelley's ("Mother's") Motion to Correct Error under Indiana Trial Rule 59 and presents the following issues for our review:

1. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it granted Mother's motion to correct error.

2. Whether the trial court committed reversible error when it did not make specific findings and conclusions pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 52.

We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Mother and Father lived together out of wedlock for much of their fifteen-year…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paragon Family Restaurant v. BartoliniIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Smith v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Baxter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Supervised Estate of Williamson v. WilliamsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Mason v. AultIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shane v. Home Depot USA, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. McGrath v. Everest National InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2010
  3. Cherokee Air Products, Inc. v. Burlington Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Indiana Department of Transportation v. HowardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. William R. Harr and Finster Courier, Inc. d/b/a Elite Express v. Julian Hayes and Tracey HayesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API