Legal Opinion
McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1993No. 11S01-9301-CV-004PublishedCited by 123 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
KRAHULIK, Justice.
We grant transfer to decide whether a party is under an obligation to disclose the identity of an expert rebuttal witness in a civil case. Archbold Ladder Co. and The Sherwin-Williams Co. (Defendants-Appel-lees below) seek transfer after the Court of Appeals granted Bertha McCullough (Plaintiff-Appellant below) a new trial on the grounds that the trial court erroneously excluded testimony, offered in rebuttal, of a non-disclosed expert retained by McCullough. McCullough v. Archbold Ladder Co. (1992), Ind.App., 587 N.E.2d 158. (Ratliff, P.J., and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chatman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Whisman v. FawcettIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Chustak v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Logal v. CruseIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Thacker v. WentzelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. Shannon S. Barabas a/k/a Shannon Sheets Barabas, ReCasa Financial Group, LLC, and Rick A. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- The Care Group Heart Hospital, LLC v. Roderick J. Sawyer, M.D.Indiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Tofany v. NBS Imaging Systems, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.