Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Lockard

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 8, 2002No. 32A04-0107-CV-307PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

William and Lela Rogers appeal from the trial court's entry of default judgment against them and in favor of Ronnie and Carla Lockard. Upon appeal, the Rogers-es present three issues for our review, which we restate as:(1) whether the trial court erred in denying the Rogerses' motion to set aside the default judgment;(2) whether the trial court erred in granting the Lockards' motion to modify their complaint to conform to the evidence; and(8) whether the trial court erred in calculating the damages awarded to the Lockards.

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Whitaker v. St. Joseph's HospitalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Johnson v. Scandia Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Gershin v. DemmingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Stoneburner v. FletcherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Olcott International & Co. v. Micro Data Base Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Time Warner Entertainment Co. v. WhitemanIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Consolidated Insurance Company v. National Water Services, LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Trinity Baptist Church v. HowardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Lily, Inc. d/b/a Weinbach Cafeteria and Fernando Tudela v. Silco, LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API