Legal Opinion

Smith v. Johnston

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1999No. 49S05-9902-CV-141PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that a default judgment must be set aside under Trial Rule 60(B)(3) for misconduct where the plaintiffs attorney filed suit and pursued the default judgment without notifying the attorneys whom she had been advised in writing were representing the defendant in the matter.

Factual and Procedural Background

Donald Johnston filed a proposed complaint with the Indiana Department of Insurance against Dr. Ray C. Smith, III, and Smith Surgical Group 1 for medical malpractice in the treatment of his wife Beverly Johnston. 2 Throughout the panel proceedings…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. William F. Grun v. Pneumo Abex Corp., Pa Holdings Corp., and the Henley Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Siebert Oxidermo, Inc. v. ShieldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Boles v. WeidnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Chelovich v. Ruff & Silvian AgencyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Fire Insurance Exchange v. Bell Ex Rel. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc. v. MarkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. County of Vanderburgh v. Weddle Bros. Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Price v. Wyeth Holdings Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. The Huntingon National Bank v. Car-X Assoc. CorpIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Shane v. Home Depot USA, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API