Legal Opinion
Friedland v. TIC-THE Industrial Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 29, 2009No. 08-1042PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Robert M. Friedland filed this contribution action pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) § 113(f), 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f), against defendants-appellees The Industrial Company (“TIC”) and GeoSyntec Consultants Inc. (“GeoSyntec”). The district court entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants-appellees based on its determination that Mr. Friedland has already recouped all of his recoverable costs from other entities and therefore has no damages to recover in this case. Mr. Friedland appeals.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Renetta M. Miera v. Dairyland Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Boeing Company, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Cascade Corporation, Opinion-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- EUGENE S. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- New York State Electric & Gas Corp. v. FirstEnergy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- NCR Corp. v. George A. Whiting Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Prager v. Campbell County Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.