Legal Opinion
Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2008-1160PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Lockheed Martin Corporation brings this action against the United States under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., for recovery of past and future response costs to remediate the environmental contamination caused by its corporate predecessor’s operation of three rocket motor-production facilities—Redlands, Potrero Canyon, and LaBorde Canyon—in California from 1954 to 1975. Both parties admit to being liable as potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”)…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Oakly Enterprises, LLC v. NPI, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- TDY Holdings, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.