Longview Fibre Co. v. Department of Ecology
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.
The Department of Ecology fined Long-view Fibre Company $5,000 for failing to maintain pollution control equipment at its kraft pulp mill in a manner consistent with “good air pollution control practice.” WAC 173-405-040(10). The superior court held that this regulation was unconstitutionally vague and reversed the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s ruling upholding the penalty. Finding that the regulation is not void for vagueness, we reverse the trial court.
FACTS
I. The Scrubbers
Longview Fibre uses power boilers at its kraft pulp mill. The boilers produce gas emissions containing particulate…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Seattle v. MontanaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Seattle v. MontanaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Blondheim v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Keene v. Board of AccountancyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Inland Foundry Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Washington Cedar & Supply Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Washington Cedar & Supply Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Northlake Marine Works, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Knudsen v. WASH. STATE EXECUTIVE ETHICS BD.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.