Legal Opinion

Grossman v. Thoroughbred Ford, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 2009No. WD 69906PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LISA WHITE HARDWICK, Judge.

Thoroughbred Ford, Inc. (“Thoroughbred”) appeals the judgment denying its motion to compel arbitration of fraud claims brought by Jilana and Jerry Gross-man (“Grossmans”). For reasons explained herein, we reverse and remand.

Factual and ProCedural History

On July 23, 2005, the Grossmans signed a Retail Buyers Order to purchase a new 2005 Ford Explorer from Thoroughbred. The purchase agreement contained a notice of arbitration and a provision requiring the parties to settle “any and all claims or disputes ... by binding arbitration.”

Two years after purchasing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Vincent v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  2. Whitney v. Alltel Communications, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Swain v. Auto Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Kagan v. Master Home Products Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Dorsch v. Family Medicine, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robert S. Eaton v. CMH Homes, Inc., and Southern Energy Homes, Inc., and Henry Concrete, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  2. Bertocci v. Thoroughbred Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Bell v. Annie's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
  4. Breanna Rose v. Santiago E. Sabala, Jr., and Verizon Communications, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Fuller v. TLC Property Management, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API