Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Vincent v. Schneider

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 30, 2006No. SC 87203PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Original Proceeding in Mandamus

WILLIAM RAY PRICE, JR., Judge.

I

Relators seek to direct the trial court (Respondent) to deny defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. Portions of the arbitration provision are unconscionable and unenforceable, but the case may proceed, consistent with this opinion, after the trial court selects an arbitrator.

II

Relators, plaintiffs below, were purchasers of single family homes from defendant, McBride & Son Homes, Inc. (McBride). Written contracts were executed for each home purchase. Each of McBride’s pre-printed contracts contained a provision that gives McBride…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Charles Harris v. Green Tree Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar CreekSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  4. Robin v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. Butler v. Mitchell-Hugeback, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Fallo v. High-Tech InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. Carla Baker v. Bristol Care, Inc., d/b/a Bristol Manor, and David FurnellSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  3. Chaganti & Associates, P.C. v. Thomas Nowotny Roger v. Vardeleon, in Re Chaganti & Associates, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Todd Hewitt, Relator v. Honorable Kristine Kerr, Judge, Circuit Court for St. Louis County, MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  5. Morrow v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API