Legal Opinion
Kagan v. Master Home Products Ltd.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 6, 2006No. ED 86574PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge.
Master Home Products, Ltd. (“MHP”) and Smart Living Products, Inc. (“SLP”)(collectively referred to as “Defendants”) appeal from the judgment denying their motion to dismiss Andrew Kagan’s (“Plaintiffs”) petition or stay the lawsuit pending arbitration. On appeal, Defendants argue the trial court erred by denying their motion because (1) the arbitration agreement is valid and enforceable in that the subject matter of the agreement falls within the scope of arbitration, and (2) the arbitration notification agreement of the Missouri Uniform Arbitration Act (“Missouri…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. DobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar CreekSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Triarch Industries, Inc. v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Bunge Corp. v. Perryville Feed & Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cicle v. Chase Bank USACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Bruce Martin Construction, Inc. v. CTB, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Suburban Leisure Center, Inc. v. Amf Bowling Products, Inc. Amf Billiards & Games, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Kohner Properties, Inc. v. SPCP Group VI, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Grossman v. Thoroughbred Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.