Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fuller v. TLC Property Management, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 2013No. SD 31931Published

1ConcurrenceNancy Steffen Rahmeyer, J.

I concur in the majority opinion but write further to address the public policy issue raised by Fuller. I begin this concurrence by also noting that a lease, such as the one at issue in this case, is both a conveyance and a contract. It is significant to remind the reader of that fact because it seems that in the modern lease the contract terms have dwarfed what used to be a land conveyance. These contract terms, including the exculpatory clause at issue in this case, are inserted into leases with no negotiation and no legal consideration, all to the detriment of the tenant.

If we were to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Hess v. Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  3. Alack v. Vic Tanny International of Missouri, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  4. Detling v. EdelbrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  5. Blanton v. DolbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API